[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4

>>"Chris" == Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org> writes:

 Chris> IMHO this is much more likely to be effective if you first get a
 Chris> consensus that there is, in fact, a problem that needs to be dealt
 Chris> with.  The posts in the other thread suggest you haven't got such an
 Chris> agreement.

 Chris> I also believe the technical committee is an inappropriate organ to be
 Chris> making such a pronouncement, particularly since this is an inherently
 Chris> non-technical matter.  Then again, since the tech committee best
 Chris> reflects the concept embodied in our constitution that us mere
 Chris> developers shouldn't be trusted to run the project in any way, shape,
 Chris> or manner, I'm hardly surprised.

 Chris> My recommendation: either find a consensus that this is needed, or
 Chris> propose it as a general resolution.  For now, I personally don't see
 Chris> the problem as severe enough to justify such a document, and nothing
 Chris> in this discussion has convinced me in the least to change this view.

	I concur heartily.

 Abstainer, n.: A weak person who yields to the temptation of denying
 himself a pleasure. Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: