Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Raul> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:27:23PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Can I too start writing up documents and claim that they ar4e
>> joint recommendations of the Technical committee? Since we are no
>> longer restricted to technical issues, I have a few choice things to
>> say about the dcma, the us senate elections, and a local councilman,
>> (not to mention Kashmir and Iraq), and I'd love to have the tech
>> ctte seal on these pronouncements.
Raul> Yes, of course you can.
I think that would be wrong, to imply that a bunch of people
had signed on to the draft document without asking them
Raul> Of course, until the committee votes on them, they remain drafts that
Raul> have not been approved by the committee.
Raul> I think, however, that much of the disagreeing is a result of Branden's
That is an insult. I am rarely swayed by Brandon's posturing,
grand and picturesque though it often is. I can take umbrage
by my own self as well.
Raul> Personally, I've not spent enough time reading the details of what
Raul> Ian and Branden have said to sort out which way's up.
Raul> Which means I've probably not been paying enough attention.
Raul> Personally, I think it's clear that Branden is upset.
Raul> Personally, I'm not clear on what Branden is upset about, but I
Raul> imagine other people are.
Raul> Maybe I should spend some time figuring what the conflicting goals
Raul> are, here?
I suggest you actually read up on the issue before joining the
discussion? I'll hold comment until you have caught up and are in a
better position to know what you are talkijng about.
Love means nothing to a tennis player.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C