Re: Woody retrospective and Sarge introspective
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> immo vero scripsit:
base freeze didn't work out very well, because there still were bugs in
base, but double-delay was quite good. I think.
> [0] Probably worth reading again, in case all the excitement since has
> let you forget. NMUs are good, mmmkay?
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/
> debian-devel-announce-200201/msg00014.html
This changed my life. :P
"Testing" probably requires NMU policy similar to this
all the time, because "testing" will require dependent
software to be RC-bug-free before a package can be in "testing".
Did I miss it, or is DELAYED going to be expanded beyond 10-days?
(or is it already)
I agree it is important that we try to build testing CDs,
and some updates of how these CDs are working would be nice.
I only realized how b-f was problematic when I started building
CDs myself, back in November last year.
regards,
junichi
--
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: