Re: Some more reality..
Steve Greenland <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On 13-Jun-00, 01:57 (CDT), John Goerzen <email@example.com> wrote:
> > ...Nor did I say that it is not useful simply because I did not use
> > it. Nor, I think, did anyone else support my position on those
> > grounds, although plenty supported the opposition on the grounds that
> > they personally used it (equally unforgivable a position to hold).
> As a Debian developer who is *very* pro free software (I recently quit
> my job because I could no longer stand working on non-free software for
> non-free systems), I do not see what is "unforgivable" about opposing
> a resolution that asks our users to do something I personally have not
> yet been able to do ( e.g. give up netscape, acroread, and the java
> jdk.) (FWIW, I don't hold that being in favor of the resolution while
Nor do I. Fortunately for all of us, my proposal does not ask our
users to do that.