[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cups-filters 1.21.0 released!



Le lundi, 20 août 2018, 23.25:52 h CEST Till Kamppeter a écrit :
> I have released cups-filters 1.21.0 now, with the following changes:
> 
>         - libcupsfilters, cups-browsed, driverless, foomatic-rip,
>           parallel: Silenced warnings from newest gcc.
>         - libcupsfilters: When generating a PPD for driverless
>           printing on a remote IPP printer, make pdftopdf not being
>           run by the local queue if the remote queue is a CUPS queue
>           to avoid running pdftopdf twice (CUPS Issue #5361).
>         - libcupsfilters, cups-browsed, driverless, bannertopdf,
>            foomatic-rip, pdftops, pdftoraster, rastertops,
>            rastertoescpx, sys5ippprinter, beh: Fixed Coverity Scan
>            issues. Thanks to Zdenek Dohnal (zdohnal at redhat dot com)
>            for the tests and the patches.
>         - bannertopdf: Switched over from using Poppler to using QPDF
>           for generating the PDF pages. With Poppler unstable APIs
>           were used which were subject to change. Thanks to Sahil
>           Arora for this project in the Google Summer of Code 2018
>           (Pull request #25).
>         - cups-browsed: Manually defined clusters ("Cluster" directive
>           in cups-browsed.conf) caused cups-browsed to crash.
> 
> In this release bannertopdf is based on QPDF and not using Poppler
> through undocumented interfaces any more, thanks to Sahil Arora's Google
> Summer of Code work. In addition, several bugs got fixed, especially the
> duplicate execution of pdftopdf (both on client and server) when one
> prints on a local queue pointing to a remote CUPS printer.
> 
> Please release this on Debian so that it syncs into Ubuntu.
> 
> It would be great if you could do it as soon as possible as we have
> Feature Freeze in Ubuntu this Thursday, August 23.

Uploaded to Debian.

Cheers,
	Odyx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: