Hello, On Sun 16 Sep 2018 at 11:20AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > With a recent upload of ghostscript [9.25] the autopkgtest of ocrmypdf > [6.2.3] fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary > packages of ghostscript from unstable. It passes when run with only > packages from testing. I copied some of the output at the bottom of > this report. James: how easily could we backport the GhostScript change to OCRmyPDF 6.x series? If not easily, and you still think that pikepdf's API will stabilise in time for Debian's upcoming stable release, maybe OCRmyPDF should just be kept out of testing for the timebeing. Paul: does preventing regressions in testing take precedence? If so, this bug should be reassigned to ghostscript and raised to RC severity. But ISTM that ocrmypdf is less important, so ghostscript should be allowed to migrate and ocrmypdf should be kicked out. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature