Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:33:45 +0000 with message-id <28022017132639.d2544ad818e6@desktop.copernicus.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#855961: Cups PPD Update authentication requested has caused the Debian Bug report #855961, regarding Cups PPD Update authentication requested to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 855961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855961 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "submit@bugs.debian.org" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Cups PPD Update authentication requested
- From: Jeff Burns <Jeff.Burns@efi.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 20:40:36 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] CFEE2A69-E37C-4F80-AEBA-BB6ED33255E3@efi.com>
Package: cups Version: 1.7.5-11+deb8u1
When doing an installation of the latest cups package, when PPDs can be updated, you are prompted for root password on localhost. You can hit enter to by pass, and this is confirmed to break even when running as root. Unfortunately this breaks unattended upgrades.
Processes that get stuck:
root 11264 0.0 0.4 63060 16884 pts/1 S+ 11:48 0:00 _ /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/share/debconf/frontend /var/lib/dpkg/info/cups.postinst triggered /usr/share/cups/ppd-updaters
root 11268 0.0 0.0 4336 1596 pts/1 S+ 11:48 0:00 _ /bin/sh /var/lib/dpkg/info/cups.postinst triggered /usr/share/cups/ppd-updaters
root 11345 0.0 0.1 65696 5388 pts/1 S+ 11:48 0:00 _ lpadmin -h /var/run/cups/cups.sock -p LANIER_5622 -m gutenprint.5.2://lanier-5622/expert
If you run apt-get from CLI to update you get this prompted:“Password for root on localhost?”
This appears to be relevant to past cups bug report #662915.Confidentiality notice: This message may contain confidential information. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not that person, you should not use this message. We request that you notify us by replying to this message, and then delete all copies including any contained in your reply. Thank you.
Jeff BurnsEngineering Systems Administrator5011 Gate ParkwayBuilding 100 Suite 225Jacksonville, FL 32256
(800) 624 5999 ext 9325
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 855961-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Jeff Burns <Jeff.Burns@efi.com>
- Subject: Re: Bug#855961: Cups PPD Update authentication requested
- From: Brian Potkin <claremont102@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:33:45 +0000
- Message-id: <28022017132639.d2544ad818e6@desktop.copernicus.org.uk>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1526DF4E-94AC-4A6F-A761-3CBB480E9BA3@efi.com>
- References: <[🔎] CFEE2A69-E37C-4F80-AEBA-BB6ED33255E3@efi.com> <[🔎] 20170224115301.GC3730@copernicus.org.uk> <31E7DA38-77AD-40C6-BEAA-4E57CCF2FEEA@efi.com> <[🔎] 26022017142541.343667863f5d@desktop.copernicus.org.uk> <[🔎] 1526DF4E-94AC-4A6F-A761-3CBB480E9BA3@efi.com>
On Mon 27 Feb 2017 at 15:58:36 +0000, Jeff Burns wrote: > Brian, > > After reviewing your results and then double checking my setup, after > some experimenting I found if I remove client.conf then the prompt for > a localhost password does not occur anymore. The contents of the > client.conf were just: > > ServerName localhost I used this and replicated your experience. :) > This seems like a pointless/redundant setting that I had if I > understand it correctly, maybe it was confusing the post install to > try and connect to itself over localhost thus prompting for a password > to update the PPDs as if it were an external print server. I think > after my quick testing this resolves my issue, but was hoping you > could shed some light on if this explanation makes sense or if there > is another reason why this would break things? A client.conf would only be used to connect to a *remote* server when there is no local cupsd. Having both is not a good thing. I think your explanation is essentially correct. You seem happy with the outcome so the report can be closed. Thank you for your diligent testing. Cheers, -- Brian.
--- End Message ---