Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>> > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much simpler
>> > > solution. the "master" branch is not intended for Wheezy, I will
>> > > use a separate "master-wheezy" for that.
>> >
>> > I think I disagree. The patch I propose makes ghostscript-cups rely on
>> > cups' postinst which is already proven working by more than 14
>> > packages, all of them already in Wheezy. I think this is a patch the
>> > Release Team can accept and a patch that makes Wheezy a better release
>> > by reducing useless code duplication in maintainer scripts.
>>
>> Oh, ok.
>>
>> Would you mind file the bugreport requesting freeze exception, when I
>> have uploaded it to unstable? I am quite lousy at arguing such cases
>> for the Release Managers :-/
>
> I remembered this bug and noticed it was fixed, but "badly": do you intend to
> upload the "nice" cups-postinst-trigger solution to Wheezy?
>
> I still think it is better than Bastien's hack on that bug.
>
> I'm also still ready to argue that with the Release Team if that helps.
I have join the release team today at debian mini conf paris. It seems
ok to fix.
Bastien
>
> Cheers,
>
> OdyX
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 201211151600.31219.odyx@debian.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 201211151600.31219.odyx@debian.org
>
Reply to: