Re: Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

["Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <odyx@debian.org>]

Hi Jonas,

Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much simpler
> > > solution.  the "master" branch is not intended for Wheezy, I will
> > > use a separate "master-wheezy" for that.
> > 
> > I think I disagree. The patch I propose makes ghostscript-cups rely on
> > cups' postinst which is already proven working by more than 14
> > packages, all of them already in Wheezy. I think this is a patch the
> > Release Team can accept and a patch that makes Wheezy a better release
> > by reducing useless code duplication in maintainer scripts.
> 
> Oh, ok.
> 
> Would you mind file the bugreport requesting freeze exception, when I
> have uploaded it to unstable?  I am quite lousy at arguing such cases
> for the Release Managers :-/

I remembered this bug and noticed it was fixed, but "badly": do you intend to 
upload the "nice" cups-postinst-trigger solution to Wheezy?

I still think it is better than Bastien's hack on that bug.

I'm also still ready to argue that with the Release Team if that helps.

Cheers,

OdyX