On 12-07-29 at 09:04pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much > > > > simpler solution. the "master" branch is not intended for > > > > Wheezy, I will use a separate "master-wheezy" for that. > > > > > > I think I disagree. The patch I propose makes ghostscript-cups > > > rely on cups' postinst which is already proven working by more > > > than 14 packages, all of them already in Wheezy. I think this is a > > > patch the Release Team can accept and a patch that makes Wheezy a > > > better release by reducing useless code duplication in maintainer > > > scripts. > > > > Oh, ok. > > > > Would you mind file the bugreport requesting freeze exception, when > > I have uploaded it to unstable? I am quite lousy at arguing such > > cases for the Release Managers :-/ > > Which other changes do you plan to include towards Wheezy? I can argue > for that one, but would have hard time for others (as I have mostly no > clue about ghostscript). But sure, I can file the bug and argue for it > in front of the Release Team. I have no other changes planned targeted Wheezy. I dare not include any non-RC bugfixes, and would also prefer the previously proposed two-line patch for this one to keep burden of Release Managers to a minimum. That's why I request that you do the talking when insisting on the more elegant but also larger fix. If anyone disagrees and want more changes included for Wheezy, now is the time (I'll wait another day to prepare the package). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature