Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much simpler
> > > solution. the "master" branch is not intended for Wheezy, I will
> > > use a separate "master-wheezy" for that.
> >
> > I think I disagree. The patch I propose makes ghostscript-cups rely on
> > cups' postinst which is already proven working by more than 14
> > packages, all of them already in Wheezy. I think this is a patch the
> > Release Team can accept and a patch that makes Wheezy a better release
> > by reducing useless code duplication in maintainer scripts.
>
> Oh, ok.
>
> Would you mind file the bugreport requesting freeze exception, when I
> have uploaded it to unstable? I am quite lousy at arguing such cases
> for the Release Managers :-/
Which other changes do you plan to include towards Wheezy? I can argue for
that one, but would have hard time for others (as I have mostly no clue about
ghostscript). But sure, I can file the bug and argue for it in front of the
Release Team.
Cheers,
OdyX
Reply to: