[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups



On 12-07-29 at 05:10pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.40:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > On 12-07-29 at 02:33pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a 
> > > écrit :
> > > > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in 
> > > > ghostscript-cups what has been done for most packages shipping 
> > > > Cups drivers: transform the postinst code into a dpkg trigger 
> > > > and let the Cups postinst do the job "as cups".
> > > 
> > > I shall also mention that this is already implemented in Ubuntu's 
> > > ghostscript.
> > 
> > I do not find it important what Ubuntu has or has not done.  So you 
> > "shall" not mention that - but you "may" as you please :-)
> 
> Pardon my vocabulary then; I ain't native english writer.

Neither am I.  And sorry if my response felt rude to you.


> That written, given the state of most of the printing stack in Ubuntu 
> and the person maintaining most of these packages there (Till, 
> openprinting's main upstream), I do find that what Ubuntu has done is 
> important. This doesn't mean that we can't keep a critical eye upon 
> their changes, but the fact that a change is already implemented and 
> tested by them is still a valuable information IMHO.

Agreed, it is valuable information.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: