Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.40:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> On 12-07-29 at 02:33pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> > > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in ghostscript-cups
> > > what has been done for most packages shipping Cups drivers:
> > > transform the postinst code into a dpkg trigger and let the Cups
> > > postinst do the job "as cups".
> >
> > I shall also mention that this is already implemented in Ubuntu's
> > ghostscript.
>
> I do not find it important what Ubuntu has or has not done. So you
> "shall" not mention that - but you "may" as you please :-)
Pardon my vocabulary then; I ain't native english writer.
That written, given the state of most of the printing stack in Ubuntu and the
person maintaining most of these packages there (Till, openprinting's main
upstream), I do find that what Ubuntu has done is important. This doesn't mean
that we can't keep a critical eye upon their changes, but the fact that a
change is already implemented and tested by them is still a valuable
information IMHO.
Cheers,
OdyX
Reply to: