[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#320279: marked as done (hpiod segfault)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:22:45 -0300
with message-id <20050729002245.GA2653@khazad-dum.debian.net>
and subject line Bug#320281: hpiod segfault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2005 02:12:18 +0000
>From omniflux@omniflux.com Wed Jul 27 19:12:18 2005
Return-path: <omniflux@omniflux.com>
Received: from (ns1.formula4success.com) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1Dxxsg-0004eQ-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:12:18 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([])
          by ns1.formula4success.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
          ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with ESMTP id com;
          Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:13:12 -0600
Received: from omniflux by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1Dxxo8-0005Lw-Bv; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:07:36 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Omniflux <omniflux@omniflux.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: hpiod segfault
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:07:36 -0600
Message-Id: <E1Dxxo8-0005Lw-Bv@localhost.localdomain>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: hplip-base
Version: 0.9.3-3
Severity: important

I have not printed anything in quite awhile (months) but when I tried
today I got this in my syslog:

kernel: hpiod[20478]: segfault at 0000000000000000 rip 00002aaaab383393
rsp 0000000040ffa8d8 error 4

This may be a problem with the amd64 version only, or it could be a
problem introduced in a version since I last tried printing.

I suspect the segfault message is not enough to determine where the
problem lies, but if you can give instructions for getting more useful
information, I'll be glad to follow them.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages hplip-base depends on:
ii  cupsys                      1.1.23-11    Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  hplip-data                  0.9.3-3      HP Linux Printing and Imaging - da
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcupsys2-gnutls10         1.1.23-11    Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libgcc1                     1:4.0.1-2    GCC support library
ii  libsnmp5              NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii  libssl0.9.7                 0.9.7g-1     SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.6-7    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  python                      2.3.5-3      An interactive high-level object-o

Versions of packages hplip-base recommends:
ii  cupsys-client                 1.1.23-11  Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
pn  hplip-ppds                    <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information


Received: (at 320281-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 00:22:53 +0000
>From hmh@debian.org Thu Jul 28 17:22:53 2005
Return-path: <hmh@debian.org>
Received: from master.debian.org [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1DyIeL-00006i-00; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:22:53 -0700
Received: from 2084130.cps.virtua.com.br (khazad-dum.debian.net) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DyIeK-0005xy-00; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:22:53 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [])
	by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D4E202C57;
	Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:22:46 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([])
	by localhost (khazad-dum []) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 20785-10; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:22:45 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 46F6A201851; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:22:45 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:22:45 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
To: Omniflux <omniflux@omniflux.com>, 320281-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#320281: hpiod segfault
Message-ID: <20050729002245.GA2653@khazad-dum.debian.net>
References: <42E8405F.5040407@omniflux.com> <20050728102029.GA14905@khazad-dum.debian.net> <42E93236.1030100@omniflux.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42E93236.1030100@omniflux.com>
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04  3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at khazad-dum.debian.net
Delivered-To: 320281-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Omniflux wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >Please test 0.9.4-1 just uploaded.
> This build solves the problem. I guess I should have just waited a few 
> more days before printing ;)

Nice! Closing the bug, then!

  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Reply to: