[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#298379: marked as done (lprng: memory leak back)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:14:15 +1000
with message-id <20050719021415.GD964@enc.com.au>
and subject line Bug#298379: lprng: memory leak back
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 04:19:55 +0000
>From ghaverla@materialisations.com Sun Mar 06 20:19:55 2005
Return-path: <ghaverla@materialisations.com>
Received: from s010600e08120dfff.ed.shawcable.net (newmain.materia) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D89ik-00022W-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:19:55 -0800
Received: from ghaverla by newmain.materia with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1D89gq-0007Ws-KU
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:17:56 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gordon Haverland <ghaverla@materialisations.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: lprng: memory leak back
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:17:56 -0700
Message-Id: <E1D89gq-0007Ws-KU@newmain.materia>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: lprng
Version: 3.8.28-2
Severity: normal

Hello.  A while ago, I reported a memory leak about the time that some
changes were done to the main package by Patrick.  You thought that they
would solve the memory leak problem.  And they did seem to.

Today I was printing some SVG stuff from Inkscape, and lprng started
chewing up memory again.  Not quite as fast as the last time, but after
a couple of hours things were getting quite sluggish again.

Do you have a plan for finding out where this memory is leaking?  I'm
going to need to print those SVG files again in the near future, so I
can set things up with lprng quite easily.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages lprng depends on:
ii  debconf                    1.4.46        Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                      2.3.2.ds1-20  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcomerr2                 1.36release-1 common error description library
ii  libkrb53                   1.3.6-1       MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libssl0.9.7                0.9.7e-3      SSL shared libraries

-- debconf information:
* lprng/setuid_tools: true
* lprng/start_lpd: true

Received: (at 298379-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2005 02:14:18 +0000
>From csmall@enc.com.au Mon Jul 18 19:14:18 2005
Return-path: <csmall@enc.com.au>
Received: from ppp114-209.static.internode.on.net (mail.enc.com.au) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1Duhcf-0003Tw-00; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:14:18 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [])
	by mail.enc.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42281B9BE4
	for <298379-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:14:16 +1000 (EST)
Received: from mail.enc.com.au ([])
	by localhost (gonzo []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
	id 01824-01 for <298379-done@bugs.debian.org>;
	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:14:16 +1000 (EST)
Received: by mail.enc.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 0793DB9BE8; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:14:15 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:14:15 +1000
To: 298379-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#298379: lprng: memory leak back
Message-ID: <20050719021415.GD964@enc.com.au>
References: <E1D89gq-0007Ws-KU@newmain.materia> <20050718232806.GE7884@enc.com.au> <200507181849.51936.ghaverla@shaw.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200507181849.51936.ghaverla@shaw.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: csmall@enc.com.au (Craig Small)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at enc.com.au
Delivered-To: 298379-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 06:49:50PM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> Might as well close this one.  Many things have been upgraded 
> since then, and I've printed quite a few things (not SVG though) 
> which haven't triggered problems like memory leaks.

  - Craig
Craig Small      GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/   MIEE         Debian developer
csmall at : enc.com.au                      ieee.org           debian.org

Reply to: