Re: baffled .. the 2019-01-27 debian-10.0-ppc64-NETINST-1.iso not bootable
On 4/6/19 11:22 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> But that file () is 5 years old, so maybe the way the shell -
>> actually `busybox` - handles (or ignored) a "local" keyword outside of a
>> function has changed?
> The installer team just uploaded busybox 1.30 last month  which introduced
> at least one serious bug . Might be that busybox 1.30 broke more stuff.
shellcheck complains about that "local" as well but it claims it's not known
to the original Unix shell at all:
glaubitz@epyc:..glaubitz/tmp> shellcheck 26zfs-devices
In 26zfs-devices line 3:
^-- SC1091: Not following: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule was not specified as input (see shellcheck -x).
In 26zfs-devices line 8:
if [ ! -f /var/lib/partman/zfs ] && [ "$(udpkg --print-os)" = kfreebsd -o "$(udpkg --print-os)" = linux ] ; then
^-- SC2166: Prefer [ p ] || [ q ] as [ p -o q ] is not well defined.
In 26zfs-devices line 19:
^-- SC2039: In POSIX sh, 'local' is undefined.
In 26zfs-devices line 23:
^-- SC2039: In POSIX sh, 'let' is undefined.
^-- SC2039: In POSIX sh, ++ is undefined.
I guess someone needs to build a fresh debian-installer on amd64, build a fresh
CD image with debian-cd and test whether this issue shows there as well.
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - email@example.com
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - firstname.lastname@example.org
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913