Re: Potential Mono removal from 32-bit big endian PowerPC in next upload
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:50:46AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:46:41AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:45:54PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 25/08/15 16:34, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:31AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:09:58AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > >>> OK, I was just trying what README.md said to do when using the get
> > > >>> monolite option.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I also just noticed I hadn't installed all the dependancies listed on
> > > >>> http://www.mono-project.com/docs/compiling-mono/linux/ so I just did that,
> > > >>> maybe it will help.
> > > >> No help.
> > > >>
> > > >> I just did:
> > > >>
> > > >> ./autogen.sh
> > > >> make
> > > >>
> > > >> And got:
> > > > Applying the patch here helped a lot:
> > > >
> > > > https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=31779#c1
> > >
> > > Looks like I already had this fix on my local ppc32 testing environment,
> > > but hadn't pushed it to that ppc32 github branch, because I'm a big
> > > idiot. Have now added that & pushed.
> >
> > Doh!
> >
> > I was wondering if that might have been the case.
>
> So after doing 'make' what are you doing to run the test suite that
> still has a failure?
I am currently running make compiler-tests, which is currently "stuck"
after doing something and seems to be using no cpu but waiting 2 seconds
again and again for soem futex.
If I try the command from
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/directhex/f890350006e72be706af/raw/2bae2f1ea487f4f6c6f7d5ccb256feda35627c28/assert
I get this:
.../mono/tests# make threadpool1.exe
[compiling output...]
.../mono/tests# MONO_PATH=../../mcs/class/lib/net_4_5/ ../mini/mono threadpool1.exe
workerThreads: 2400 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2400 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2399 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2399 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2399 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2399 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2399 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2399 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2399 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2399 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2399 completionPortThreads: 96
workerThreads: 2399 completionPortThreads: 96
test_casllback:TEST1 0ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST2 0ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST3 0ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST4 0ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST5 0ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST1 1ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST2 1ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST3 1ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST4 1ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST5 1ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST1 2ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST2 2ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST3 2ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST4 2ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST5 2ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST1 3ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST2 3ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST3 3ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST4 3ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST5 3ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST1 4ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST2 4ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST3 4ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST4 4ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST5 4ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST1 5ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST2 5ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST3 5ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST4 5ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST5 5ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST1 6ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST2 6ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST3 6ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST4 6ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST5 6ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST1 7ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST2 7ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST3 7ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST4 7ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST5 7ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST1 8ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST2 8ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST3 8ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST4 8ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST5 8ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST1 9ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST2 9ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST3 9ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST4 9ATH: 2399
test_casllback:TEST5 9ATH: 2399
CSUM: 50
--
Len Sorensen
Reply to: