[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NFS mounts: access rights problem



found 492970 1:1.1.4-1 1:1.1.5-1
thanks

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:18:13PM +0100, Mich Lanners wrote:
>Hi Aníbal
>
>On  27 Feb, this message from Aníbal Monsalve Salazar echoed through
>cyberspace:
>>What versions are you using on the server and client?
>
>Server: 1:1.0.10-6+etch.1
>Client: 1:1.1.4-1  (upgraded from 1:1.1.2-6lenny1 on 20090220)
>
>>Can you reproduce the bug with version 1:1.1.4-1 of nfs-common and/or
>>nfs-kernel-server?
>
>Yes, that is the version that exhibits the problem.
>
>>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492970
>
>Aha... Missed that one because it is archived.
>
>My client is running kernel 2.6.15, so using legacy mount command.
>/proc/mounts doesn't show the sec= status. "mount" only shows the
>option that I gave to the mount command, but doesn't show the sec= in
>effect if I provide none. So I have found no way to verify what sec= is
>in effect.
>
>In other words, the problem reported in #492970 is still present:
>
>mount.nfs from nfs-utils 1.1.4-1 does not work on kernels with legacy
>nfs mount interface.
>
>New bug report?

Let's use #492970.

I tested nfs-common 1:1.1.4-1 and 1:1.1.5-1 on amd64 and the bug is
still there.

>Thanks, and cheers
>
>Michel
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Michel Lanners                 |  " Read Philosophy.  Study Art.
>23, Rue Paul Henkes            |    Ask Questions.  Make Mistakes.
>L-1710 Luxembourg              |
>email   mlan@cpu.lu            |
>http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan        |                     Learn Always. "

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: