[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

network problem on openpower710



Hi,

I have a openpower710 running Debian. It had hardware problem.
This has been fixed. Now I have a kernel that can boot, but the network
interface won't work :
Configuring network interfaces...SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
SIOCSIFNETMASK: No such device
SIOCSIFBRDADDR: No such device
eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
Failed to bring up eth0.
SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
eth1: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
SIOCSIFNETMASK: No such device
SIOCSIFBRDADDR: No such device
eth1: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
eth1: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
Failed to bring up eth1.
done.

kernel versions tested :
2.6.21-1-powerpc64
and
2.6.18-4-powerpc64

kernel messages concerning eth interfaces :
Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.3.20-k2-NAPI
Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation.
PCI: Enabling device: (0000:c0:01.0), cmd 3
e1000: 0000:c0:01.0: e1000_probe: (PCI-X:133MHz:64-bit)
00:0d:60:de:b5:78
SCSI subsystem initialized
libata version 2.20 loaded.
ipr: IBM Power RAID SCSI Device Driver version: 2.3.1 (January 23, 2007)
e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
PCI: Enabling device: (0000:c0:01.1), cmd 3
e1000: 0000:c0:01.1: e1000_probe: (PCI-X:133MHz:64-bit)
00:0d:60:de:b5:79
e1000: eth1: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection

the network interfaces can be seen with lspci :
0000:c0:01.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546EB Gigabit
Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01)
0000:c0:01.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546EB Gigabit
Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01)

I have also use the SMS ping utility with success.

Does anybody have an idea ?

Thanks in advance, xavier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


Reply to: