[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mount hfs+ partition



I think this is a problem with the install (2.6.8-3) on the r3 sarge CD, actually.   Earlier versions (both r1 and r2), even if they didn't have hfsplus built into the kernel, at least had it as a loadable .ko module on the installer's initrd.   Not the case with r3.  I presume it's installed on the /target drive, and I suppose an insmod from there will work just as well, but I really get the impression that the installer initrd is as barebones as they come.
   

 
On 10/31/06, Ralf Saalmüller <ralf@mail.ralf-saalmueller.de> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 31.10.2006 um 07:54 schrieb brian:

> shame, shame both of you: Read the Fine Manual.
>
> hfs plus is mounted via -t ufs, there is no
> such thing as -t hpfsplus !!!!
>
> ("man mount" for whole story)
>
> brian

Sorry brian, I don't bother what the man mount does say, as I use
hfsplus for some years now on at least 3 debian installations and two
Ubuntu. hfsplus is alive!

One thing you might to is apt-get install hfsplus as it is a package
within otherfs. And debian is well known not always getting the whole
thing done. On the other side, hfsplus is part of the ppc kernel 2.4
and 2.6.

There is such a thing as -t hfsplus.

Ralf

- ---
Ralf Saalmüller
Amonshöhe 26
97437 Hassfurt
Germany
PPCNUX-Team
http://www.ppcnux.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFRwW2tKcsE7vsbMERApSYAJ9s+8BUcWcjPicvPEMdzS9nMlB72wCfSgT7
pevRDQFfAJUsklKhUQ+/+BY=
=s5Sz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: