[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 2.6.17-rc2



Ben, Johannes,
thanks for your prompt replies.

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 01:19:47PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 00:06 +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > Did a testrun of 2.6.17-rc2 on my PowerBook 5,6 today.
> > 
> > Tried to answer all the make oldconfig questions in a sensible way. ;)
> > 
> > * It compiled and started without major problems.
> > 
> > * I expected sound problems and yes, I had no sound.
> Should be fixed in current git

I knew from this list that it was close to going in,
but it is good to know that it is in now.

> > * When closing the lid, my powerbook did not go the sleep.
> 
> Can you tell more ? is pbuttonsd running ? 
> Do you see something in dmesg ?

I will have to do a fresh run.
After the xfs problem turned up, 
this kept me busy to get to a working state and it makes me a bit afraid
to boot the kernel again.


> > * /proc/cupinfo reported the wrong Mhz, it reported 799 or so,
> >  while  have 1,5Gh.
> 
> You probably have cpufreq support enabled and switched to low speed ... 

Of course! I indeed enabled this for the first time 
and did not make the mental connection.

> > * When running konqueror it seems I have managed to create a bad
> >   inode with xfs (running over lvm oder a crypto partition with dmsetup)
> > 
> >   xfs_repair cannot repair this data!
> >   I copied this partition to a file with dd and the failre stays 
> >   consistant.
> > 	I am attaching more detailed data.
> 
> This should be reported to lkml & the xfs maintainer (whoever that is)

I was using xfsprogs 2.6.20-1 (from Sarge),
thus I will try to backport 2.7.16-1 and see if this can repair it first
before reporting.

For completeness, the maintainer is SGI,
	XFS FILESYSTEM
	P:      Silicon Graphics Inc
	M:      xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com
	M:      nathans@sgi.com
	L:      linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
	W:      http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs


	Bernhard

Attachment: pgpGOslPrcNvR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: