Re: 2.6.11 again
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:59 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Hi list, hi kernel gurus,
>
> i reported some time ago a build error of 2.6.11rc?. I tried the
> FTBFS bug-fix from Fabbione: no result.
>
> Building the kernels with
> gcc-3.3 (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8) went well.
>
> The same config with
> gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 20050203 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-9)
>
> stops as follows:
> CHK include/linux/compile.h
> UPD include/linux/compile.h
> CC init/version.o
> LD init/built-in.o
> CHK usr/initramfs_list
> GEN .version
> CHK include/linux/compile.h
> UPD include/linux/compile.h
> CC init/version.o
> LD init/built-in.o
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> mm/built-in.o(.rodata.cst4+0x0): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_ADDR32 empty_zero_page+40000000
> make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1'
> make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
>
> Please find attached .config (2.6.11-rc4-mm1) which works well with
> 2.6.10 though.
>
> Do we need a ppc FTBFS bug-fix before releasing 2.6.11?
Not sure what's up there, looks like it could be a gcc issue ...
Ben.
Reply to: