Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
That's correct. Of course, you realize that this is one thing on which Debian is not standards-compliant? :)
Which one? Far as I know, other than runlevels 0, 1 and 6, System V doesn't have any special definitions for multi-user runlevels, other than that runlevels 2-5 are vendor- or site-defined multiuser runlevels. Does LSB go with the RH definitions, where 2 is "basic multiuser", 3 is "multiuser with network", and 4 is "multiuser with network and X"?
As the saying goes, "the wonderful thing about standards is there are so many to choose from..."
-- Derrik Pates dpates@dsdk12.net