[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: severe printing problem on b&w g3 / sid



On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:02:07PM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> 
> I've been running Sid on a Blue nad White G3 for the better part of a
> year now, and am finally trying to track down the origin of a severe
> printing problem.  I've been unable to solve the problem even by
> taking pretty drastic measures, e.g., removing CUPS and switching to
> pdq or LPRng, upgrading to kernel 2.6.x... 

(currently running .4.23, self-rolled, off of the benh kernel line)

> 
> I have two printers, both connectedo n USB -- one color dotmatrix
							  ^ er, I mean
							  laserjet, of
							  course, my
							  age is showing
> (canon s520) and one laser printer (brother hl-1440).  Both work
> perfectly well with the same hardware connections when the g3 is
> booted up in Macos 9 (not that I do that anymore...).  But from linux,
> I have similar problems on both:  'garbage' symbols (hearts, question
> marks, accented letters, and other pictorial images, mostly) that cut
> across the page, and page splitting -- that is, a single page will be
> pritned across two, three, or even four physical pages.  Sometimes
> large numbers of sheets of paper will spew out of the printer with
> just a single line of garbage on the top.  
> 
> As I said, the hardware is fine.  I assume, then, that the problem is
> somewhere else:
> 
> in the postscript conversion programs?  But I use the regular,
> recommended methods for generating postscript (a2ps with lprng, the
> cups filters with cups).  
> 
> The usb-printer /usb-lp drivers?  But surely I'd have heard of a big
> problem like this if other people had it, too?  
> 
> - something wrong with the underlying usb driver for the g3
> hardware...  I suppose that's posible, but again, seems like I would
> haveheard about soething so serious by now...  
> 
> Anyway, it's a serious issue, and one I'd like to fix.  Anyone seen
> anything like this before?  Any troublehooting suggestions?  
> 
> thanks as always,
> 
> matt
> 
> 



Reply to: