Re: Sleep problems in kernel 2.6 from mvista.com
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:57, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > When I do it now it seems to accelerate... it starts slow but becomes
> > much faster...
> > Does that sound like being caused by the anticipated scheduler ?
> > What I don't understand is why the cpu is at 100% while it was not with
> > 2.4.
> You have CONFIG_PREEMPT ? If yes, then don't look further for the
> culprit ;)
I wish I had... no I don't I disabled when you advised me to disable it
when I was on 2.6. hunt last time.
zgrep CONFIG_PREEMPT /proc/config.gz
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set