[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: rsync vs BK kernel trees
To
: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <
benh@kernel.crashing.org
>
Cc
: Derrik Pates <
dpates@dsdk12.net
>, Debian PowerPC list <
debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
>
Subject
: Re: rsync vs BK kernel trees
From
: Andrew Nesbit <
alnesbit@discus.anu.edu.au
>
Date
: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:58:40 +1100 (EST)
Message-id
: <
Pine.GSO.4.50.0301301358160.458-100000@discus.anu.edu.au
>
Reply-to
:
Andrew.Nesbit@anu.edu.au
In-reply-to
: <
1043782455.537.12.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr
>
References
: <
Pine.GSO.4.50.0301282228360.24672-100000@discus.anu.edu.au
> <
20030128175112.GA29794@dsdk12.net
> <
1043782455.537.12.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr
>
Thankyou for the clarification. Andrew.
Reply to:
debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Andrew Nesbit (on-list)
Andrew Nesbit (off-list)
References
:
rsync vs BK kernel trees
From:
Andrew Nesbit <alnesbit@discus.anu.edu.au>
Re: rsync vs BK kernel trees
From:
dpates@dsdk12.net (Derrik Pates)
Re: rsync vs BK kernel trees
From:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Prev by Date:
Re: Hardware clock on dual G4 highly inaccurate?
Next by Date:
ALSA on TiBook
Previous by thread:
Re: rsync vs BK kernel trees
Next by thread:
Keeeeyboard problems
Index(es):
Date
Thread