Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch

To: daenzer@debian.org (Michel Dänzer)
Cc: rbrito@iname.com (Rogério Brito), debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch
From: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 10:58:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 200205261458.g4QEwDm93884@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1022413311.1190.21692.camel@tibook> from "Michel Dänzer" at May 26, 2002 01:41:51 PM

Michel =?ISO-8859- writes:
> On Sun, 2002-05-26 at 10:54, Rogério Brito wrote:

> * Anything more than -O3 seems to be useless, I think Albert even
>   suggested trying with only -O2

I suggest trying -Os as well. Sometimes it runs fastest,
because smaller code fits in the instruction cache better.
Using -O3 or above does just the opposite, inlining pretty
much everything. So -O2 is a compromise, but try -Os too.

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch
  - From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>

References:
- Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch
  - From: Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch
Next by Date: TiBook Woody configuration problems
Previous by thread: Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch
Next by thread: Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread