Re: RaiserFS PPC status
Andrew Sharp <andy@netfall.com> writes:
> That would make sense, since they do all the Linux XFS developemnt
> on ia32 and ia64 boxes! At least they did when I worked in that
> group. But XFS is a very mature piece of code in general compared
> to ReiserFS, which is much newer piece of code. Maybe one day I'll
> have a chance to do a performance analysis between the two. They
> have different internal designs.
http://bulma.lug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=626
It looks kind of simplistic, but I've also heard anectdotal evidence
that XFS is quite fast (and performs faster while being more stable
than Reiserfs).
--
David N. Welton
Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
Personal: http://www.efn.org/~davidw/
Work: http://www.innominate.com/
Reply to: