[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Buildd Failures



Stephen R Marenka wrote:

> I found the following probably need to be requeued, since they built
> fine for me using pbuilder and Nov. 12 sid.

BTW is there a reason against just uploading the built packages instead
of requeueing them?


> I was wondering what the uncompiled bit the failed log means.
> Here's an example.
> 
> editors/emacs-dl-canna_1.4-4 by dan-voltaire
> [extra:uncompiled:PREV-FAILED]

It means no version of that source package has been successfully built
yet. I guess out-of-date is obvious. :)


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast



Reply to: