Re: Bug#116780: util-linux: hwclock shouldn't be run

To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#116780: util-linux: hwclock shouldn't be run
From: Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org>
Date: 24 Oct 2001 23:58:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1003960724.28642.1157.camel@pismo>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011023234540.S4785@plato.local.lan>
References: <20011023142316.DA83C1044E@alexanderwohl.complete.org> <Pine.NEB.4.40.0110231830140.20982-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muench <[🔎] 20011023131603.A1445@nevyn.them.org> <[🔎] CQBP0C.A.dnG.7Mk17@murphy> <[🔎] 20011023234540.S4785@plato.local.lan>

On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:45, Ethan Benson wrote:

> you generally have to manually upgrade kernel packages

Virtual packages like kernel-image-apus might be a good idea?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#116780: util-linux: hwclock shouldn't be run
  - From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>

References:
- Re: Bug#116780: util-linux: hwclock shouldn't be run
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#116780: util-linux: hwclock shouldn't be run
  - From: Robert Bar <r_bar@gmx.de>
- Re: Bug#116780: util-linux: hwclock shouldn't be run
  - From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>

Prev by Date: Re: G3's, G4's, Altivec, DVD's, iBooks, and TiBooks
Next by Date: Re: G3's, G4's, Altivec, DVD's, iBooks, and TiBooks
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#116780: util-linux: hwclock shouldn't be run
Next by thread: Re: Bug#116780: util-linux: hwclock shouldn't be run
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread