On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:16:41PM -0700, Laurent de Segur wrote: > > I wrote in a previous email to express my surprise about getting a > '-powerpc' extension at the end of the version returned by the command -pmac perhaps? > 'uname -r' with a pre-compiled kernel image, which I think should not be > done. I understand now why such a decision was made, as it can't be > determine at runtime by entering a simple 'uname -p'. thats not the problem, debian packages only distinguish processer archetecture. so there is no way to have kernel-image-2.2.19 packages for chrp, prep, pmac and such without adding something to the EXTRAVERSION which is included in uname -r. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpnHLKQJ5Em1.pgp
Description: PGP signature