[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: HFS+ (MacOS) in contrast to EXT2 (Linux-i386)



On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 05:07:39PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > the conclusion is macos is just stuffing its head in the sand.
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> Run Norton Utilities or the brain dead utility that comes with MacOS on it,
> and it will find and hopefully repair the errors.
> 
> If you don't do this, you are asking for trouble on HFS, HFS+, EXT2,
> FAT, FAT32, and to some extent NTFS, EXT3, XFS, XFS, JFS.

NTFS, FAT* yes, ext3, xfs, and jfs no.  ext3, xfs and jfs are
journalling filesystems so the recovery work is done in kernel space
rather then userspace.  the fsck that goes with those filesystems is
only intended for severe damage (which you will know about since the
mount will fail due to journal rollback errors). 

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpQ9KgxVgrfr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: