On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 05:09:22PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > It's not a question of whether it's useful, it's a question of whether it's > > NECESSARY. I haven't heard reports about any other architecture > > *requiring* an explicit BusID in the XF86Config-4 file for the server to > > work. If that proves to be the case, I'll add them to the list. > > With your 4.1.0 from two weeks or so back, I didn't have to specify a > busid at all. Rage LT Pro, not 128. Well, I had to for 0pre1v5. Maybe the atimisc driver has more brains that the r128 driver... > It seems this can be solved without giving a busid. If not, autodetect it > for one device, ask on finding more than one and switch to fbdev on > finding no device. You mean the fbdev driver, or "UseFBDev"? If the former, then I need to do my lspci parsing and busid template management before prompting the user for a driver. If no VGA device is found, I would then not ask any questions about the video hardware. -- G. Branden Robinson | Kissing girls is a goodness. It is a Debian GNU/Linux | growing closer. It beats the hell out branden@debian.org | of card games. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
Attachment:
pgpqYfUAGgGkG.pgp
Description: PGP signature