Re: glibc 2.1.13-17 and kernel headers
Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > > >if you have to ask these questions i think you should not be compiling
> > > >libc.
> > > [more snippage]
> > >
> > > Perhaps, but then I would not be able to do some of the things that
> > > I do want to.
> >
> > Namely?
>
> To run software that requires 2.2 without having to upgrade to
> unstable? So maybe problem is not solved after all.
??? You don't have to build libc for that.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project member
Reply to: