[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

"David N. Welton" wrote:
> Andrew Sharp <andy@netfall.com> writes:
> > That would make sense, since they do all the Linux XFS developemnt
> > on ia32 and ia64 boxes!  At least they did when I worked in that
> > group.  But XFS is a very mature piece of code in general compared
> > to ReiserFS, which is much newer piece of code.  Maybe one day I'll
> > have a chance to do a performance analysis between the two.  They
> > have different internal designs.
> http://bulma.lug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=626
> It looks kind of simplistic, but I've also heard anectdotal evidence
> that XFS is quite fast (and performs faster while being more stable
> than Reiserfs).

But it's not as space efficient, is it?

Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)    \   Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
CS student, Free Software enthusiast   \        XFree86 and DRI project member

Reply to: