Re: RaiserFS PPC status
"David N. Welton" wrote:
> Andrew Sharp <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > That would make sense, since they do all the Linux XFS developemnt
> > on ia32 and ia64 boxes! At least they did when I worked in that
> > group. But XFS is a very mature piece of code in general compared
> > to ReiserFS, which is much newer piece of code. Maybe one day I'll
> > have a chance to do a performance analysis between the two. They
> > have different internal designs.
> It looks kind of simplistic, but I've also heard anectdotal evidence
> that XFS is quite fast (and performs faster while being more stable
> than Reiserfs).
But it's not as space efficient, is it?
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project member