Re: Motif or GNOME? (semi-repost)
On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 01:34:39PM -0500, Bill wrote:
> Thanks Hadess. I wasn't aware of these issues. BTW, I did not mention
> that I will be using the application only under X Windows
> environments, and I guess what I was really asking was how does Motif
> compare to GNOME or KDE? Why is Motif (relatively) crappy? That's
> what I'm after.
Motif is old, not very nice looking, more difficult to use than Gtk+ (well for
the programmer). Also you don't get a free implementation easily, thus you
need to provide static binaries (as netscape does) or hope the user paid for
motif.
> Am I correct in understanding that KDE is C++ and GNOME is not? Not
> clear what you meant. I use C++.
Well, Gtk+ and Gnome are two different things. Gtk+ is mainly C, but has
binding in many languages, including C++. See www.gtk.org for more details.
> The Windows port might be nice, but GNOME doesn't have it?
There is a windows port of gtk+, i managed to get gimp running under windows
two years ago with it, it did not find my home directory though an quited.
> Also, not sure what you mean by paying money? OpenGL is a protocol
> and graphics library available on most platforms for doing graphics,
> when possible, it directly calls graphics hardware, so it is fast,
> and a very powerful library for doing complex graphics fairly easily
> (once you learn it).
Well, i think he spoke about the developpment tools,
Friendly,
Svne Luther
Reply to: