Re: mol build
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 09:47:19PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 03:31:28PM -0700, Bradley C. Midgley wrote:
> > hi guys
> >
> > i would like to see mol added to the available packages (or at least do a
> > one-off proper package), so i started trying to build it from inside
> > debian. a couple of notes:
>
> packages certainly would be nice, i have to do all kinds of patching
> to make the damn thing go into /usr/local where it belongs. there is
> more to life then .rpm sheesh....
I'm still planning on doing this. I should have a machine to do it on
sometime in the next week or two.
> > 2. libelf is not explicitly linked into mol. i've sent a patch upstream
> > but i don't know why it would work without -lelf under redhat. hmmph.
>
> yup i don't know why this is still broken it *should* fail everywhere
> but i suspect nobody actually compiles this bugger themselves. adding
> -lelf to the linker arguments in Rules.make seems to work fine...
I'll poke around at this - it's probably a more fundamental library
difference.
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: