Re: Migrating to glibc-pre2.1
- To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Migrating to glibc-pre2.1
- From: Eric Anholt <anholt@teleport.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 18:10:42 -0800
- Message-id: <l03130300b285ed5f2dd8@[204.202.165.107]>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.03.9811271249280.6597-100000@mercator.cs.kuleuven.ac.be>
Well, I had a Netscape 4.5 sitting around, and X is sorta working, so I
tried it. In deb, I fix961212'ed the files in the install directory, then
ran the installer fine. I fixed the files in the /usr/local/netscape
directory and tried running it. It asked for libstdc++.so.2.8. I have
.2.9, but when I ln'ed 2.9 to 2.8 and netscape opened up fine. Note,
however, that there were some errors, due to the color problems I
mentioned earlier on this list. I got Slashdot up, though I experienced
the general bugginess of NS 4.5 (which I had noticed before moving to deb
too) I haven't tried a NS 4.0x yet.
Could someone out there forward me a full "rgb.txt" file from their X? I
would be grateful. I am currently using the "minimal" one that xpm
provides, and it's pretty ugly and is constantly spewing about not having
colors. :-(
>I'm migrating to Debian sid with glibc-pre2.1. The one killer application that
>prevents me from switching away from glibc-1.99 is Netscape Communicator.
>
>If I copy all libraries netscape needs to a directory and let LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>point to that directory, `ldd netscape' shows me that it uses the libraries in
>those directory, except for libdl.so.1. That's with glibc-1.99.
>
>With glibc-pre2.1 and LD_LIBRARY_PATH pointing to the same directory, I just
>get a segmentation fault. I suspect it's a problem with /lib/libdl.so.1.
>Anyone with a clue how to fix this? I really want to get rid of my glibc-1.99
>system, and still be able to use netscape, of course.
>
>BTW, this is communicator 4.05. 4.5 gives me the `unresolved inheritance
>error'.
>
>Greetings,
>
> Geert
>
>P.S. Needless to say, if I succeed, future XF68_FBDev binaries with hardware
> acceleration support will be linked against glibc-pre2.1, to encourage
> other people to upgrade :-) A similar trick caused the dead of libc4 on
> Linux/m68k in 1995, while the Linux/ia32 guys are still trying to burry
> libc4, hehe...
>--
--
Eric Anholt
anholt@teleport.com
Reply to: