Re: List for missing packages
On Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 08:47:50PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > Oh, and I think there's nothing wrong with using gmp2 or slang0.99.38;
> > they can coexist happily.
>
> Because, we should break _now_ as much as possible! I have no slang0.99
> installed and what happens: lynx depends on it! This is bad. Second
> reason is: slang0 does not have a real *so version numbering.
>
> It is the same reason why we shouldn't use tcl7.6 or termcap or perl4 or
> a.out.
>
> And i think we shouldn't support libg++. It is old, only for backward and
> libstdc++ is the real choice.
I'm of the opinion that instead of breaking as much as possible now, we
should get it to work first and THEN break it.
Dan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: