Re: List for missing packages
On Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 08:47:50PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > Oh, and I think there's nothing wrong with using gmp2 or slang0.99.38;
> > they can coexist happily.
> Because, we should break _now_ as much as possible! I have no slang0.99
> installed and what happens: lynx depends on it! This is bad. Second
> reason is: slang0 does not have a real *so version numbering.
> It is the same reason why we shouldn't use tcl7.6 or termcap or perl4 or
> And i think we shouldn't support libg++. It is old, only for backward and
> libstdc++ is the real choice.
I'm of the opinion that instead of breaking as much as possible now, we
should get it to work first and THEN break it.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org