Hello, On Tue 15 Jul 2025 at 12:03pm +02, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > +1 to clarifying the DELAYED queue section. Please also include an > example dcut command on how to remove a package from the DELAYED queue > if the maintainer does not want to have it. > > Personally I would much rather see a contribution being submitted to > my packages as a Merge Request on Salsa, than as a NMU via DELAYED. If > I am active, I can immediately engage in discussion about the change. > If I am really busy I can just merge it without discussion, or comment > that I am fine with it but don't have time to review deeper. If I am > completely missing, I would be fine if somebody posted a MR and then > after a few weeks went and merged it themselves and uploaded. This > would still feel more collaborative than noticing a new package > version as NMU in DELAYED. Does this resonate with others? Yeah, me too (though I'd prefer a BTS bug to an MR, but it's the same). The thing about DELAYED is that it's fire-and-forget for the contributor actually doing the work, which is an advantage. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature