[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1109323: developers-reference: extend documentation of delayed/deferred queue



+1 to clarifying the DELAYED queue section. Please also include an
example dcut command on how to remove a package from the DELAYED queue
if the maintainer does not want to have it.

Personally I would much rather see a contribution being submitted to
my packages as a Merge Request on Salsa, than as a NMU via DELAYED. If
I am active, I can immediately engage in discussion about the change.
If I am really busy I can just merge it without discussion, or comment
that I am fine with it but don't have time to review deeper. If I am
completely missing, I would be fine if somebody posted a MR and then
after a few weeks went and merged it themselves and uploaded. This
would still feel more collaborative than noticing a new package
version as NMU in DELAYED. Does this resonate with others?


Reply to: