On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:51:17 +0100 Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue 13 Jun 2023 at 05:58PM +01, Mark Hindley wrote: > > > There is a new upstream version of elogind[1] that is already packaged in > > Devuan[2] although that uncovered up an upstream issue that I am waiting to be > > resolved[3]. So, maybe by the end of this month? > > > > However, that is only considering whether the packaging and dependencies can be > > made to work (like Simon McVittie, I think they probably can). > > > > I remain much less convinced that there is a consensus for requiring packages to > > use tmpfiles.d(5) for /var, /tmp and maybe /etc. The recent thread on > > debian-devel demonstrated a range of opinion. Thorsten and Bill have just raised > > valid points about chroots. > > > > So, whilst I am happy to test the dependency changes in elogind, enshrining this > > as a 'should' in the Policy now seems, at least, premature. > > Cool, thank you. This will simplify resolving this bug. Is there anything needed from me to make progress on this? Any changes required to the last revision posted? -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part