Hello Mark, On Tue 13 Jun 2023 at 01:51PM +01, Mark Hindley wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 11:58:07AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> Exactly. My hope is that if we had: >> >> Package: systemd >> Architecture: linux-any >> Provides: default-systemd-tmpfiles, systemd-tmpfiles >> Conflicts: systemd-tmpfiles >> Replaces: systemd-tmpfiles >> >> Package: systemd-standalone-tmpfiles >> Architecture: linux-any >> Provides: systemd-tmpfiles >> Conflicts: systemd-tmpfiles >> Replaces: systemd-tmpfiles >> >> Package: elogind >> Depends: systemd-standalone-tmpfiles # or Recommends? > > In principle and just looking at the dependencies this seems a viable > solution. It is very similar to the way we handle the logind and > default-logind virtual packages. Thank you for reviewing. Do you have a rough idea of how long it would be until you could confirm that this is viable, and implement it in sid? -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature