[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#886258: Clarify whether or not the Standards-Version field must be present, or lower Lintian tag severity



On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:08:55PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Given that it seems we have a strong project consensus on always
> including the field, seeking seconds to make Policy reflect that:
> 
> > diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> > index 77ff81f..44080c9 100644
> > --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> > +++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ package) are:
> >
> >  -  :ref:`Build-Depends et al <s-sourcebinarydeps>`
> >
> > --  :ref:`Standards-Version <s-f-Standards-Version>` (recommended)
> > +-  :ref:`Standards-Version <s-f-Standards-Version>` (mandatory)
> >
> >  -  :ref:`Homepage <s-f-Homepage>`
> >
> > @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ is described above, in :ref:`s-controlsyntax`.
> >
> >  -  :ref:`Dgit <s-f-Dgit>`
> >
> > --  :ref:`Standards-Version <s-f-Standards-Version>` (recommended)
> > +-  :ref:`Standards-Version <s-f-Standards-Version>` (mandatory)
> >
> >  -  :ref:`Build-Depends et al <s-sourcebinarydeps>`

seconded.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: