control: reassign -1 debian-policy control: tag -1 -moreinfo +patch control: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org control: usertags = normative Hello, On Wed 18 Jul 2018 at 03:22AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > To clarify, /missing/ Standards-Version? If so it is, err, not > prevalent at all: > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/no-standards-version-field.html Thanks Jonathan and Chris for establishing that this Policy change would not make any packages buggy. Given that it seems we have a strong project consensus on always including the field, seeking seconds to make Policy reflect that: > diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > index 77ff81f..44080c9 100644 > --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ package) are: > > - :ref:`Build-Depends et al <s-sourcebinarydeps>` > > -- :ref:`Standards-Version <s-f-Standards-Version>` (recommended) > +- :ref:`Standards-Version <s-f-Standards-Version>` (mandatory) > > - :ref:`Homepage <s-f-Homepage>` > > @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ is described above, in :ref:`s-controlsyntax`. > > - :ref:`Dgit <s-f-Dgit>` > > -- :ref:`Standards-Version <s-f-Standards-Version>` (recommended) > +- :ref:`Standards-Version <s-f-Standards-Version>` (mandatory) > > - :ref:`Build-Depends et al <s-sourcebinarydeps>` -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature