On 13/11/17 19:34, Russ Allbery wrote: > Could you please file this as a bug? > > I'm a bit confused about the difference between vim-nox, vim, and > vim-python and what vims are available in the archive that do not satisfy > vim-python, so if you could include that information in the bug as well, > that would help. > I have opened wishlist bugs for vim-python3 [1] and vim-python [2]. It may make sense to merge them. vim-python is already present in the repos, so whatever the outcome of the vim-python3 bug I think it ought to be in the virtual packages name list (with the proper changes in the explanation entry). [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881633 [2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881642 [3]: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt Kind regards, -- Víctor Cuadrado Juan me@viccuad.me PGP key ID: 4096R: 0xA2591E231E251F36 Key fingerprint: E3C5 114C 0C5B 4C49 BA03 0991 A259 1E23 1E25 1F36 My signed E-Mails are trustworthy.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature