[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Add vim-python3 & vim-python to list of virtual packages (was: Add already existing `vim-python` virtual package to list of virtual packages)



On 13/11/17 19:34, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Could you please file this as a bug?
> 
> I'm a bit confused about the difference between vim-nox, vim, and
> vim-python and what vims are available in the archive that do not satisfy
> vim-python, so if you could include that information in the bug as well,
> that would help.
> 

I have opened wishlist bugs for vim-python3 [1] and vim-python [2]. It may
make sense to merge them.

vim-python is already present in the repos, so whatever the outcome of
the vim-python3 bug I think it ought to be in the virtual packages
name list (with the proper changes in the explanation entry).

[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881633
[2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881642
[3]: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt

Kind regards,

-- 
Víctor Cuadrado Juan           me@viccuad.me

PGP key ID: 4096R: 0xA2591E231E251F36
Key fingerprint: E3C5 114C 0C5B 4C49 BA03  0991 A259 1E23 1E25 1F36
My signed E-Mails are trustworthy.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: