[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#868496: debian-policy: Please Clarify Need for update-fonts-dir in postinst and postrm Scripts



Hi,

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:38:33PM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> I am adding the maintainer of the New Maintainer's Guide and the Guide
> for Debian Maintainers, Osamu Aoki, to this discussion.  I would like
> to reassign this wishlist bug to one of those packages if Osamu
> agrees.

Reassin to "Guide for Debian Maintainers"
(But not to "New Maintainer's Guide")

I will consider add a note to data package.

> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Paul Hardy <unifoundry@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sean,
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> wrote:
> >> Hello Paul,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 04:28:03PM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> >>> My intention was to point someone new to packaging fonts in Debian in
> >>> the direction of an easy path, rather than leaving it up to that
> >>> person to find things out the hard way--or worse yet, doing things the
> >>> hard way.
> >>
> >> Right.  It would be good to have that somewhere ...
> >>
> >>> How about a footnote pointing to
> >>> https://wiki.debian.org/Fonts/PackagingPolicy?  That document is not
> >>> formal policy, but it would make life easier for someone if they are
> >>> new to packaging fonts.
> >>>
> >>> Alternatively, do you think this bug report should get reassigned to
> >>> the New Maintainer's Guide and be addressed as a request there?  The
> >>> scope of that guide is mainly to walk someone through creating a
> >>> simple binary package.
> >>
> >> ... and the new maintainer's guide seems like a decent place.

But not the right structure to address extension as I will be talking at
debconf17.
  https://debconf17.debconf.org/users/osamu/

The maint-guide package used to serve as the “tutorial” for the Debian
packaging but recently is becoming out of sync with the modern Debian
packaging practices and it lacks practical packaging examples. I have
created the debmake package which is a Multi-arch aware packaging helper
and rewrite packaging tutorial as the debmake-doc package. I would like
to discuss how to improve this situation.

I would also like to discuss how to make this new tutorial document to
become accepted and also get more people to make similar documentation
efforts by making documentation work more attractive for the new
contributors. There are both merits and demerits with lowering entry
barriers. I would like to elaborate on ideas to encourage new
contributors.

Also, I would like to raise awareness to the practical challenges of
maintaining DEP-5 compliant debian/copyright file when updating the
package with changing licenses.
  
> >> How about adding a section to that guide listing links to packaging
> >> guides for specific types of packages, such as fonts?
> >
> > I can certainly do that if the maintainer of that package would like
> > to add such a section.  I have filed a bug report with a set of
> > proposed patches for maint-guide, and would wait for that to get
> > processed first (with my patches accepted or rejected).
> 
> Osamu:
> Do you think that mentioning font packaging in the Guide for Debian
> Maintainers or the New Maintainer's Guide is appropriate?  If so, I
> will reassign this bug to the package you prefer.  I think just a
> pointer to https://wiki.debian.org/Fonts/PackagingPolicy with a brief
> explanation will be enough, with the expectation that the Fonts Wiki
> page will always have the most current information.  If you do not
> think that information about packaging fonts belongs in either guide,
> let me know and I will try to come up with some other idea.
>
> As of today, the New Maintainer's Guide is still required reading for
> New Maintainers, but the Guide for Debian Maintainers is not required
> reading.  I will assume that is going to change in the future with
> Osamu's focus on the latter document going forward if font packaging
> information is added there.  Otherwise, someone wanting to package
> fonts for Debian for the first time could still wind up having to hunt
> for and hopefully be lucky enough to find the Fonts Wiki page to learn
> how.

I will update "New Maintainer's Guide" soon to deprecate it and
recommend reading "the Guide for Debian Maintainers".  (Still
translation presence may keep its worth for a while.)

Osamu


Reply to: