Hello, On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:34:42PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Experiments on new fields are welcome, and it is good to open bugs to track > them. But I think that we should first see how the proposed field gets > traction before adding it to the specification. codesearch.debian.net suggests that this field is now used in quite a few packages. It seems reasonable to add a description of its use to the copyright format. I have some questions about Ben's patch: 1) the patch needs to be rebased against current policy 2) Is there a missing "License-Grant:" here: > Files: debian/patches/fancy-feature > Copyright: 2010 Daniela Debianizer > + This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify > + it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > + the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or > + (at your option) any later version. > License: GPL-3+ -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature