Bug#707851: Debian Menu Systems : Implementation of the TC decision
>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> writes:
Charles> Le Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:27:53AM -0400, Sam Hartman a
Charles> écrit :
>> Hi. I've been debating how to respond to the shall vs must
>> thing. The short answer is that there are reasons why you might
>> prefer shall, but I find that I'd rather say "must is good
>> enough," than try and come up with an articulate presentation of
>> the energy which would conclude by saying that if must still
>> seemed like the right choice go with it.
>>
>> So, I'm fine with s/shall/must.
Charles> Thanks Sam,
Charles> the word "shall" appears only once in the Policy (quoted
Charles> below), so I think that avoiding it is consistent with the
Charles> Policy's style.
Nod, I think it was clear from your first message that this was your
argument.
I agree it's a valid position someone could take.
Reply to: