[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#796442: §5.5 Uploads to suites other than unstable/experimental should use codenames, not suites



Le Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:59:23PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> 
> --- devref.orig.txt     2015-08-21 22:49:46.985614431 +0200
> +++ devref.new.txt      2015-08-21 22:58:15.226984105 +0200
> @@ -2209,9 +2209,10 @@
>      from the first line of the debian/changelog file and places it in
>      the Distribution field of the .changes file.
>  
> -    There are several possible values for this field: stable,
> -    unstable, testing-proposed-updates and experimental. Normally,
> -    packages are uploaded into unstable.
> +    Packages are normally uploaded into unstable. Uploads to unstable or
> +    experimental should use these suite names in the changelog entry;
> +    uploads for other supported suites should use the suite codenames,
> +    as they avoid any ambiguity.
>  
>      Actually, there are other possible distributions: codename
>      -security, but read Section 5.8.5, “Handling security-related

Thanks Didier, I think that the change reflects current practice and
should be committed.  Here is a DocBook-ised version.

diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk
index 457619d..126eaac 100644
--- a/pkgs.dbk
+++ b/pkgs.dbk
@@ -285,10 +285,10 @@ The package build process extracts this information from the first line of the
 <literal>Distribution</literal> field of the <filename>.changes</filename> file.
 </para>
 <para>
-There are several possible values for this field: <literal>stable</literal>,
-<literal>unstable</literal>, <literal>testing-proposed-updates</literal> and
-<literal>experimental</literal>.  Normally, packages are uploaded into
-<literal>unstable</literal>.
+Packages are normally uploaded into <literal>unstable</literal>. Uploads to
+<literal>unstable</literal> or <literal>experimental</literal> should use these
+suite names in the changelog entry; uploads for other supported suites should
+use the suite codenames, as they avoid any ambiguity.
 </para>
 <para>
 Actually, there are other possible distributions:

Are there other comments on Didier's proposal ?

Have a nice week-end,

-- 
Charles


Reply to: